On this page
How-to guide
Thai pages to reviewable cards
Thai adds segmentation and tone challenges—plan for a deliberate review stage instead of trusting first-pass extraction.
Thai pages become reviewable cards with trustworthy readings and unambiguous prompts. You catch segmentation and tone issues during approval—not weeks later in daily reviews.
How to do it
Work through one batch at a time. Finish review before you upload the next set of pages.
-
Upload Thai worksheet or textbook captures as separate batches per lesson.
-
Run extraction and sort drafts by obvious quality: reject illegible captures immediately.
-
For each keeper, verify tone marks and word boundaries against the photo zoomed in.
-
Split cards that test both reading and meaning into separate prompts when reviews feel muddy.
-
Tag by lesson date or unit so weekly review volume stays predictable.
-
Approve only cards you would confidently answer aloud, then export or study the batch.
Quick check before you approve
- Readings follow the standard you use with your tutor or course materials.
- Cards with ambiguous segmentation are split or rejected—not patched with vague hints.
- English glosses on the back are concise and match the Thai front exactly.
When something goes wrong
Handwritten tutor notes
prefer screenshots over photos; reject lines OCR cannot parse cleanly.
Similar-looking words
add minimal disambiguating context on the front, not a paragraph.
Batch too large
pause uploads until the current lesson batch is fully reviewed.
Related reading
Continue with nearby topics in the same workflow—import, review, then study or export.
Keep exploring the workflow
Start with the pillar that matches your question, then follow the linked guides for the next step.
Ready to try the workflow?
Upload your study pages, review the extracted cards, and export only the material you want to keep in Anki.